This post originally appeared on the MedCity News website on December 6, 2015.
On a recent assignment, we encountered a hospital client who had built up a bureaucratic maze of medical directors and executives tasked with steering both the business and clinical sides of the hospital’s owned medical practice network. Unfortunately, rather than facilitating smooth operations, the additional layers of management slowed the decision-making process, created confusion for providers and support staff, and produced inconsistent operating performance from clinic to clinic.
At the client’s request, we provided training on operational governance and introduced our council model to the physician network. As they began to implement our training, the physicians and other providers became engaged as peers and as partners, providing the positive peer pressure and clinical direction necessary for day-to-day operations within each individual practice and across the entire medical group.
In implementing this new system of operational governance, our hospital client noted that many of their traditional medical director roles had become superfluous. As a consequence, they asked for our help in creating a streamlined and effective implementation management infrastructure that would support the new operational governance model and perhaps even allow for the elimination of these unnecessary director roles.
Such a request is not uncommon; we have interim managers out in the field who are seeing similar situations on a regular basis. What we’ve learned from being on the ground is that, as we mentioned in the previous article, hospital-owned physician networks can benefit greatly from studying successful independent practices and applying what they learn to their own infrastructure.
Let’s take a look at some of the principles of management that work well for independent practices and examine how those principles can apply in a medical practice network setting.